Thanks for replying, but not once as a user (or "creator") have I ever felt remotely valued by the core team or anyone remotely associated to it.
I'm bullish on the POTENTIAL for THIS protocol, but increasingly frustrated.
Should "users" just go into stasis for 18 months?
Stop iterating more complexity - concentrate on getting the minimum viable product right and then communicate it CLEARLY (as @dharmesh stressed previously).
You have a pool of developers and users getting increasingly disenfranchised. They care so much they put in the effort to try to help - yet, you seem incapable of LISTENING.
No audience ➡️ no content ➡️ no developers
@AlexValaitis will apparently review and action these:
bitclout.com/posts/9a2ff577566a8dae76845083f9d855d0d1171640f7d9bc76e6633b6d77a68a57
Maybe review and answer the community questions collated by @Sandirose for the last town hall:
bitclout.com/posts/0db97082aa587a1642472efc368f7badbfbeeec1bf1010c29f59b5ae2069aec2
The optimal time to invest in $DESO has shifted, making the current period a strong opportunity due to capital gains and participation rates. A clear arbitrage chance exists if you trust the tech and ecosystem. ✈️
I appreciate you as a community member here, and appreciate your responses.
There are two audiences - Devs, and End users.
The goal is to create explainers and content that appeals to both.
Our current ecosystem isn't sticky enough unfortunately to retain at a high enough % - a great new app experience will.
I do agree, there are many end user value props that need to be marketed clearly, and some of those are highlighted in my original post, and why I also posted asking for suggestions.