Count me in!

Yes. I would love to. I’ll send you some funds this afternoon

👋🏼 You know I’m always down! 💖

We have a problem with this type of thing, it was great to contribute the financing of Q3 together, but it is really illogical that the same users have to be financing this type of great things that DSW does.
We need companies willing to collaborate, large investors, continuing to finance ourselves only means prolonging the agony. It will eventually die, and that's a shame, because it's great to reward users for their activity. A complicated topic, really.

I have to admit I am with @Jhayppy and @BKPOWER8 in this. It really defeats the purpose of a #post2earn and lowers the credibility of the program if it comes from the community and goes back to the community. It was ok as a one-off, but if it happens a few more times, it is less and less #post2earn - the way it is advertised.

I did suggest some of these to Phil in our chat before the earlier effort you drove. Putting it in public for @edokoevoet and the @DesocialWorld Team's consideration:

1. Choose a Lower Amount - Instead of $1250, do 10 Contributions of $125 each as an NFT and maybe only one big contributor picks up all 10.

2. Increase the visibility they get for the amount. Why not do 1 promoted posts or Pinned Post for 1-3 days every month. Maybe some NFT projects wouldn't mind sponsoring a $125 NFT then. Think @Unicat, @SharkGang @PenWyn @cloutpunk @Miceheads increasing their sales by even 2-3 NFTs gives them the ROI.

3. Use your own Creator Coin as the Giveaway instead of a Dollar Amount. Also builds loyalty and ownership among your loyal users.

4. Consider using DAO Token and raise a small funding round like you did with @Post2EarnDAO

5. Consider doing a shorter time-frame and maybe even automating the process. Sponsor next 4 weeks for 300$ instead of the $1250. Maybe some project launching a new NFT like @CloutJacks may not mind sponsoring an event during Halloween. Not to put pressure, just quoting examples. I am thinking of the @Krassenstein show being sponsored by a few smaller projects at the time.

Personally, I feel there's still a little bit of gaming in that mass-tagging and people using too many posts are at least 30-50% of the Top 5 and that's also why I feel making it less Top-Heavy will reduce the menace quite a bit. People won't spend 10s of hours mass-tagging for 2-3$ more and also if say 10-25 get 3$ instead of 1$, it will increase loyalty and widen the spread of money.

Last but not least, I do appreciate everyone who contributed the last time and I will consider joining in this time just to be part of the effort. Even if my brain says that it just doesn't make sense. :-)