The fact remains that not everything revolves around money. The question I pose is the need to create a clear defense network (censorship) for the users' right to live in a healthy environment.
Promoting immutable freedom in a blockchain is not a point against these criminals.
And if the content stays in the blockchain but the apps ban the user, it is de facto censorship.
So it would be interesting to shed light on this karma of the blockchain as a place of "true freedom" of web3 versus web2.
What limits must those who create the blockchain put in place?
What immense work of control/manage and censorship is incumbent on app (frontend) owners.
We all have a desire for DeSo to become relevant in the social environment, but what are the rules to avoid distortions of criminal users?
Are apps structured sufficiently to cope with the waves of dangerous and community-damaging users?
Since the "Genius" fired a large part of the content moderators, X has become a worse social and is becoming more and more ungovernable.