democratized truth, democratized ownership is what you're portraying here.

It might help to portray the difference between current blockchains / EVM (server-based truth), versus this in like 2 sentences

It might help to portray the difference between current blockchains / EVM (server-based truth), versus this in like 2 sentences:

1) EVM processing costs are prohibitive Vs. DeSo cheap
2) EVM justice is a hard-fork Vs. human consensus is flexible




"The True Consensus of Liberty"

... is the idea that genuine freedom arises when collective decisions are made transparently and rooted in an immutable truth.

It suggests that liberty is best secured not by the decree of a single authority, but through an honest, shared agreement among the people - each person one vote. This phrase implies that when every voice is heard and every decision is grounded in unalterable facts—while recorded on a blockchain through public discourse—we achieve a purer truer form of democracy.

Here, consensus isn't simply about majority rule; it's about the ability for a minority to also define their law and how they meet compromise with the majority. An equal participation in developing law that embodies the true spirit of liberty, where every individual is both a participant and a guardian of the shared truth that is the foundation of our new society: The True Consensus of Liberty.

decentralized truth. yes.


democratized ownership?  hhmm , not sure. 

let's define that:

personal ownership is ideal.

but society could take my possessions away from me .. if i stole them, right?

 shouldn't society seize them for their rightful owner?

