here's what i thought about quote reposting with lol

thinking outside the box to enable trustless-ness on DESO.

In this post, he describes a consensus mechanism for layers above the data.
DESO uses revolution proof of stake, where individuals 'vote' on server reputation using their capital, thereby delegating the duty to verify blockchain data.

However, there exists layers above data storage, where it might be ideal for individuals to verify directly, i.e. 1 person 1 vote. For items such as NFT ownership, smart contracts, voting systems, truth- what if the 'nodes' were people?

For example, we've seen the ByBit hack, where malicious javascript was run on a singular employee's PC, taking 400kETH... The alternative would be--javascript required to be run by 10 different ByBit employees to send funds.

For ex. I state: 'I will send $100 to X if Y happens'. If Y happens and I defect from the original javascript/promise, there will be other people to run the original promise in the background, until votes are compiled on-chain, and the money is sent from a custodial wallet.

A mix of consensus mechanisms is a great take here, could see it.