AI replacing judges? #ElonMusk claims his Grok AI can render "extremely compelling legal verdicts" by training on all court cases. But imagine a future where Musk's AI is the Supreme Court. A short piece on power, AI, and authoritarian control.
Here’s the problem: when one person owns the AI that interprets laws, the concept of justice becomes dangerously subjective. Musk’s AI could dictate verdicts based on his own biases, political goals, or alliances. Goodbye impartiality, hello dystopia. Think it’s far-fetched? Consider this:

Musk already controls a global communications network (Starlink).
He’s building influence in international politics (UK, US, Russia).
Now he wants AI to control the courts. This isn’t innovation—it’s power consolidation.

As far-fetched as it sounds, these types, say what they want out loud. This normalises it for, first, the cult-like following, and then the masses.
If Musk’s AI becomes the foundation of the judiciary, who will challenge him? A monopoly on justice would make him untouchable—both legally and politically. The laws would work for him, not for the people. From Neuralink to Starlink to Grok AI, Musk is building tools that control minds, communication, and now justice. If left unchecked, this isn't just a tech empire—it's a blueprint for authoritarian rule in the digital age.

The idea of AI judges isn’t just a tech fantasy; it’s a dystopian reality waiting to happen. Read my full take on Musk’s rise to unchecked power here: medium.com/@jdarmstrong73/the-tech-tyrant-from-tesla-to-tyranny-c62854af2c52

#TTDT @stargeezer @vampirecampfire @goldberry @randhir @mcmarsh @sandirose @bitdads
@StubbornDad @bkpower8 @Skknlover @jodybossert @MightyOneManBand @rhynelf @desocialworld @SeanSlater @psyc500
@homey @Moggel @ThisDayInMusicHistory @TangledBrush918 @WritersWithoutWalls @Pixelangelo @PatrickCraven @jemarsh