All posts by users that @Charitylotto follows
@natalia_bel
5a6dcc877b92007907d2f5d71d7d47b2193d72c98823916aa7a69b8e19205ce6
@ThisDayInMusicHistory
f3af7d60488e9d69009c40e35870708841bf8563ae61e84f401b2f91efa6c44d

✌️🎧🎀🎸πŸͺ•πŸ₯πŸŽΉπŸŽΊπŸŽΆπŸŽ·πŸŽ»πŸͺ˜πŸ’ƒπŸ•ΊπŸ»

April 21, 1968

Tom Jones appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show performing the song β€œDelilah”.

#music #thisdayinmusic #thisdayinmusichistory #playlist #musicheals #musiccommunity #musicnews #musiclovers #post2earn

1
4
0
12
0.018
0
0
0
@SeanOlson
e1631e5c3e866ad815dca6b22b39a37c37c164256b531e9c2b3b18b3b18c96bc

Who else got the cheap eggs for #easter?

Image attached by @SeanOlson to a post
0
0
0
@eileencoyle
dcf3df998bfe4fbbf213bb132c9e1f4993c583c935fedab84e2dfc2433979495

Goodnight πŸŒ™βœ¨

1
0
0
@clayoglesby
89714297a4a86e330148e4ab449228c7ede1454b12353c67e942a9a47b703b83

Buy in May and pray. Godspeed degenerates. 🫑

0
0
0
1
0.018
@Africuz
52204c6937c2272b5c1fd7bf5efa5288712167f78e5fc1f167afe244965ab093

after posting on Focus i try to make sure to post at @DeSocialWorld
Keep this place running!

0
0
0
@Africuz
32d44098ee7f1ed43b8b5660bcb67048114af907468bc033322c2254a44ef5e1

world that doesn't care about our existence...
#africuz #photography @PhotographersCorner

Image attached by @Africuz to a post
0
0
0
1
0.018
@Randhir
5ba27cf0c7891028cba00dc484ed97d3db4aa60ca2afb6a2fca8660d253e0c46

Even with SG almost on its way out, at 8 DESOs with DESO at 6$ is something that's unimaginable. Putting it for sale at 2X the price since even that's probably close to the cheapest Shark out there. And I love this broken glass design - go ahead and steal it from me.

@SharkGang
a40e96096dfc7631ef56ecbd665578e1913aed620b0b0ba2cf739a6c3f8ccf13

Shark Gang #0834

Image attached by @SharkGang to a post
7
13
3
19
0.018
0
0
0
2
0.018
@Randhir
1495300c7c11a94b81254db9120c9cb01538f473731920f5d712cbb13a9a1930

Is my understanding accurate that any developer building an app that shows content that the user explicitly wants hidden (not seen by others) is violating some EU Content Privacy/Protection laws by doing so?

Specifically asking for you since your app does show that content and you live in GB/Europe.

@StarGeezer
1faaafec4bbae538a69c2ab38065002444f83fd0ead07884599692ea00f552dc

YSK: Whatever you put on-chain πŸ‘‰ STAYS on the chain
πŸ’‘ Just a friendly reminder that blockchain is immutable
πŸ’­ But, what is and what shouldn't be immutable
πŸ‘‰ Politicians/Celebs etc. "whitewashing" their history
πŸ‘‰ Individuals wanting to be forgotten?

Content can "marked as" hidden, but not deleted and not forgotten.

Any transaction can be viewed on the block explorer, or through graphQL.

An example of what could happen, e.g.
- User posts a innocuous post
- It gets traction, diamonds, reposts
- They then edit it to be something illegal
(how do the other users feel at that point)
- They then move into a more public-facing/high-profile position and "whitewash" their history
- They hide that post

Interested in the debate this has already sparked.

What are your thoughts?

Replaced the image as @Brootle seemed sensitive to me using his test account for the example. But this example depicts what could happen more succinctly...

Image attached by @StarGeezer to a post
4
5
0
4
0.018
6
0
0
2
0.018
@anku
b47b05dd8b43fe62dd05d2669fc608d2ee84b22e394daf12d374adcf24793ef2

i wonder if focus dev test focus app only via localhost on web url or also on PWA. PWA is so trash and can't even scroll smoothly fyi $stas_kh $wintercounter πŸ™ƒ

4
0
0
@StarGeezer
1faaafec4bbae538a69c2ab38065002444f83fd0ead07884599692ea00f552dc

YSK: Whatever you put on-chain πŸ‘‰ STAYS on the chain
πŸ’‘ Just a friendly reminder that blockchain is immutable
πŸ’­ But, what is and what shouldn't be immutable
πŸ‘‰ Politicians/Celebs etc. "whitewashing" their history
πŸ‘‰ Individuals wanting to be forgotten?

Content can "marked as" hidden, but not deleted and not forgotten.

Any transaction can be viewed on the block explorer, or through graphQL.

An example of what could happen, e.g.
- User posts a innocuous post
- It gets traction, diamonds, reposts
- They then edit it to be something illegal
(how do the other users feel at that point)
- They then move into a more public-facing/high-profile position and "whitewash" their history
- They hide that post

Interested in the debate this has already sparked.

What are your thoughts?

Replaced the image as @Brootle seemed sensitive to me using his test account for the example. But this example depicts what could happen more succinctly...

Image attached by @StarGeezer to a post
4
5
0
4
0.018